TechCortex Logo

Categories

Components

Gaming Equipment

Other

OrdersComparePC BuilderWishlistAccount
Back to Blog

RTX 5070 vs RX 9070: The Real 1440p Difference

Mykhailo Druz9 min read
RTX 5070 vs RX 9070: The Real 1440p Difference

The RX 9070 averages about 13% higher 1440p frame rates than the RTX 5070 and packs 16GB versus 12GB of VRAM, for about $41 more in our catalog. The RTX 5070 wins heavy ray tracing. Here is who should buy which.

On this page
  1. Rasterized gaming: the RX 9070 leads at 1440p
  2. Ray tracing: this is where the RTX 5070 earns its place
  3. Upscaling and features: FSR 4 finally competes, DLSS still reaches further
  4. VRAM and power: two quiet wins for the RX 9070
  5. Price and availability in our catalog
  6. Who should buy which

For rasterized gaming at 1440p, the RX 9070 is the better buy: it averages about 13% higher frame rates than the RTX 5070 in native rendering, carries 16GB of VRAM against the 5070's 12GB, draws less power, and costs only about $41 more in our catalog. Buy the RTX 5070 instead if you play heavy path-traced games, want the widest day-one upscaling support and Multi Frame Generation, or run creator apps that lean on CUDA and NVENC — because in those specific cases it pulls ahead of anything the 9070 can do.

Both cards launched in March 2025 at the same $549 MSRP, aimed squarely at each other (GamersNexus). That is why the matchup is confusing: on paper they share a price and a target resolution, so the spec sheet does not tell you which one to put in your build. The answer comes down to two questions — how much ray tracing you actually turn on, and whether 12GB of VRAM is enough for the games you play at the settings you play them.

Rasterized gaming: the RX 9070 leads at 1440p

In plain rasterized rendering — no ray tracing — the RX 9070 is the faster card at 1440p, and by a margin you can measure. Testing on a high-end CPU bench, GamersNexus recorded the 9070 at 172 FPS versus the 5070's 152 in Resident Evil 4 (Prioritize Graphics), and 96 FPS versus 83 in Starfield at Ultra — leads of about 13% and 15% (GamersNexus). Across a broad suite the average settles near 13% in the 9070's favor at 1440p.

MSI RTX 5070 12G SHADOW 3X OC
MSI RTX 5070 12G SHADOW 3X OC

That lead is not universal, and the honest exception matters. Some engines favor NVIDIA hard — in Final Fantasy XIV: Dawntrail, GamersNexus found the 5070 about 21% ahead of the 9070 (GamersNexus). So "13% faster" is an average, not a promise for every title. If the specific games you play are the NVIDIA-leaning kind, the raster gap can shrink to nothing or flip. For most 1440p libraries, though, the 9070 is the card that puts more frames on screen.

Ray tracing: this is where the RTX 5070 earns its place

Turn on ray tracing and the story splits by how heavy the RT load is. In light and moderate implementations the 9070 keeps up: on Cyberpunk 2077's medium RT preset the two were effectively tied at roughly 81 FPS (GamersNexus). For the hybrid ray tracing most games ship, the 9070's RDNA 4 RT cores are good enough that you are not giving up much.

Full path tracing is a different sport. In Black Myth: Wukong at 4K with its heaviest RT settings, GamersNexus measured the RTX 5070 at 73 FPS against just 24 for the RX 9070 — the 5070 roughly triples it (GamersNexus). This is the core of the 5070's case. If your rotation includes path-traced titles — Cyberpunk's Overdrive mode, Wukong, Alan Wake 2 — NVIDIA's RT hardware is in a class the 9070 cannot reach at these settings. The honest caveat cuts both ways: even the 5070 needs upscaling and frame generation to make 4K path tracing smooth, so this win is real but conditional on how much of your library actually uses it.

Upscaling and features: FSR 4 finally competes, DLSS still reaches further

Upscaling is now part of how both cards are used, and here the two are closer than they used to be. FSR 4 is exclusive to RDNA 4 and therefore present on the 9070, and it was a genuine leap for AMD — reviewers credit it with closing most of the image-quality gap that made older FSR a liability. In TechSpot's testing, FSR 4 Quality delivered a 29% frame-rate uplift on the 9070 versus a 23% uplift from DLSS 4 Quality on the 5070 (TechSpot). Where FSR 4 is supported, the 9070 no longer trades away picture quality to gain frames.

The RTX 5070's edge is reach, not per-title quality. DLSS ships in far more games than FSR, it is likelier to be present on day one of a new release, and the RTX 50 series adds Multi Frame Generation, which the 9070 has no direct equivalent to. The catch for AMD is that FSR 4 only helps in titles that support it — older games fall back to worse FSR versions or none at all. If you buy new releases at launch and lean on upscaling to hit high refresh, that ecosystem breadth is a real, if situational, reason to choose the 5070.

VRAM and power: two quiet wins for the RX 9070

The RX 9070 carries 16GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus; the RTX 5070 has 12GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus. The 5070's memory is faster per gigabyte, but 12GB is already the tight number at 1440p when you max textures and enable ray tracing in the newest games — and RT itself consumes VRAM. The 9070's extra 4GB is the more future-proof position for a card you plan to keep a few years. If you are unsure how much you need, our guide to how much VRAM gaming actually requires walks through it by resolution and settings.

Asus AMD Radeon RX 9070 16GB GDDR6
Asus AMD Radeon RX 9070 16GB GDDR6

Power is the other quiet win. The 9070 is rated at 220W board power against the 5070's 250W, and in gaming GamersNexus measured about 224W versus 231W (GamersNexus) — so the faster raster card is also the cooler, quieter one in most titles. Both are comfortable on a quality 650W supply; our PSU wattage guide for RTX 50-series cards covers the math, and it applies to a 9070 build at this power level too.

Price and availability in our catalog

Prices move, so here is where the two sit in our catalog as of writing:

RTX 5070RX 9070
Price (our catalog)$916.60$957.72
Memory12GB GDDR716GB GDDR6
Rated board power250W220W
1440p raster (vs the other)baseline~13% faster
Heavy ray tracingPulls far aheadFalls off
UpscalingDLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen, wider supportFSR 4, RDNA 4 only

The gap is only about $41, so unlike the higher tiers this is not a "pay double for a small gain" argument — it is a straight trade of strengths. You can drop either card into a full build with automatic compatibility and power-supply checks in our PC Builder, and our best GPU for 1440p gaming roundup shows where each sits against the rest of the stack.

Who should buy which

  • Buy the RX 9070 if you game at 1440p in mostly rasterized titles, want 16GB of VRAM for headroom, or care about lower power and noise. You get more frames per dollar and the more future-proof memory for essentially the same money.
  • Buy the RTX 5070 if you play path-traced games, want the widest day-one upscaling support plus Multi Frame Generation, or run CUDA/NVENC creator workloads — the areas where the 9070 genuinely falls behind.

The honest version: at these prices the RX 9070 is the default 1440p pick for most players, and the 5070's 12GB VRAM is the one spec that could age it early. But if ray tracing is why you are upgrading, the raster average is the wrong number to shop by — the 5070's RT lead is exactly the thing a spec-sheet glance misses. If you want the step-up fight one tier higher, our RTX 5070 Ti vs RX 9070 XT breakdown covers the same trade at more frames and more money.

Frequently Asked Questions

About the author

Mykhailo Druz

Written by

Mykhailo Druz

Co-Founder, Technical Lead & Editor-in-Chief, TechCortex

Mykhailo Druz is a co-founder, technical lead, and editor-in-chief at TechCortex, a US PC hardware store. As the company developer, he created CortyAI, the AI assistant behind the TechCortex PC Builder.

RTX 5080 vs RX 9070 XT: What Double the Price Buys
Comparisons
GPU
NVIDIA

RTX 5080 vs RX 9070 XT: What Double the Price Buys

The RTX 5080 costs about twice the RX 9070 XT in our catalog but leads by only roughly 15-20% in 4K raster. It pulls far ahead in path tracing. Here is who should buy which.

September 8, 2026
10 min
4
Single-Channel vs Dual-Channel RAM: What You Actually Lose
Comparisons
RAM
Performance

Single-Channel vs Dual-Channel RAM: What You Actually Lose

One 16GB stick or two 8GB sticks? Dual-channel is worth about 12% average FPS and 16% of your 1% lows at 1080p, and far more on an APU. The catch: the two-stick kit often costs less.

September 6, 2026
8 min
2
RTX 5070 Ti vs RX 9070 XT: Where Each One Actually Wins
Comparisons
GPU
NVIDIA

RTX 5070 Ti vs RX 9070 XT: Where Each One Actually Wins

The RX 9070 XT matches the RTX 5070 Ti in raster for about $266 less in our catalog, but the 5070 Ti pulls ahead the moment you turn on ray tracing and draws far less power. Here is who should buy which.

September 4, 2026
9 min
3
X870 vs X870E: What the Pricier Chipset Actually Buys
Comparisons
Motherboard
Am5

X870 vs X870E: What the Pricier Chipset Actually Buys

X870 and X870E run your GPU and main SSD at the same PCIe 5.0 speed straight from the CPU, so gaming FPS is identical. The extra money buys USB and SATA ports, not frames.

September 3, 2026
7 min
3
16GB vs 32GB RAM for Gaming: Is 32GB Worth It?
Comparisons
RAM
Performance

16GB vs 32GB RAM for Gaming: Is 32GB Worth It?

16GB still runs almost every 2026 game at the same average FPS as 32GB. The gap only shows up in 1% lows on the newest open-world titles and when background apps eat your headroom — here's when 32GB is worth the money and when it isn't.

September 2, 2026
8 min
2
Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Core i7-14700K: Gaming vs Cores
Comparisons
CPU
AMD

Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Core i7-14700K: Gaming vs Cores

The 7800X3D is the faster gaming chip and the cheaper one here, while the 14700K only wins in heavy multi-core work. Here's which one to buy in 2026.

September 1, 2026
9 min
4