TechCortex Logo

Categories

Components

Gaming Equipment

Other

OrdersComparePC BuilderWishlistAccount
Back to Blog

RTX 5070 vs RX 9070: The Real 1440p Difference

Mykhailo Druz9 min read41 views
RTX 5070 vs RX 9070: The Real 1440p Difference

The RX 9070 averages about 13% higher 1440p frame rates than the RTX 5070 and packs 16GB versus 12GB of VRAM, for about $41 more in our catalog. The RTX 5070 wins heavy ray tracing. Here is who should buy which.

On this page▾
  1. Rasterized gaming: the RX 9070 leads at 1440p
  2. Ray tracing: this is where the RTX 5070 earns its place
  3. Upscaling and features: FSR 4 finally competes, DLSS still reaches further
  4. VRAM and power: two quiet wins for the RX 9070
  5. Price and availability in our catalog
  6. Who should buy which

For rasterized gaming at 1440p, the RX 9070 is the better buy: it averages about 13% higher frame rates than the RTX 5070 in native rendering, carries 16GB of VRAM against the 5070's 12GB, draws less power, and costs only about $41 more in our catalog. Buy the RTX 5070 instead if you play heavy path-traced games, want the widest day-one upscaling support and Multi Frame Generation, or run creator apps that lean on CUDA and NVENC — because in those specific cases it pulls ahead of anything the 9070 can do.

Both cards launched in March 2025 at the same $549 MSRP, aimed squarely at each other (GamersNexus). That is why the matchup is confusing: on paper they share a price and a target resolution, so the spec sheet does not tell you which one to put in your build. The answer comes down to two questions — how much ray tracing you actually turn on, and whether 12GB of VRAM is enough for the games you play at the settings you play them.

Rasterized gaming: the RX 9070 leads at 1440p

In plain rasterized rendering — no ray tracing — the RX 9070 is the faster card at 1440p, and by a margin you can measure. Testing on a high-end CPU bench, GamersNexus recorded the 9070 at 172 FPS versus the 5070's 152 in Resident Evil 4 (Prioritize Graphics), and 96 FPS versus 83 in Starfield at Ultra — leads of about 13% and 15% (GamersNexus). Across a broad suite the average settles near 13% in the 9070's favor at 1440p.

MSI RTX 5070 12G SHADOW 3X OC
MSI RTX 5070 12G SHADOW 3X OC

That lead is not universal, and the honest exception matters. Some engines favor NVIDIA hard — in Final Fantasy XIV: Dawntrail, GamersNexus found the 5070 about 21% ahead of the 9070 (GamersNexus). So "13% faster" is an average, not a promise for every title. If the specific games you play are the NVIDIA-leaning kind, the raster gap can shrink to nothing or flip. For most 1440p libraries, though, the 9070 is the card that puts more frames on screen.

Ray tracing: this is where the RTX 5070 earns its place

Turn on ray tracing and the story splits by how heavy the RT load is. In light and moderate implementations the 9070 keeps up: on Cyberpunk 2077's medium RT preset the two were effectively tied at roughly 81 FPS (GamersNexus). For the hybrid ray tracing most games ship, the 9070's RDNA 4 RT cores are good enough that you are not giving up much.

Full path tracing is a different sport. In Black Myth: Wukong at 4K with its heaviest RT settings, GamersNexus measured the RTX 5070 at 73 FPS against just 24 for the RX 9070 — the 5070 roughly triples it (GamersNexus). This is the core of the 5070's case. If your rotation includes path-traced titles — Cyberpunk's Overdrive mode, Wukong, Alan Wake 2 — NVIDIA's RT hardware is in a class the 9070 cannot reach at these settings. The honest caveat cuts both ways: even the 5070 needs upscaling and frame generation to make 4K path tracing smooth, so this win is real but conditional on how much of your library actually uses it.

Upscaling and features: FSR 4 finally competes, DLSS still reaches further

Upscaling is now part of how both cards are used, and here the two are closer than they used to be. FSR 4 is exclusive to RDNA 4 and therefore present on the 9070, and it was a genuine leap for AMD — reviewers credit it with closing most of the image-quality gap that made older FSR a liability. In TechSpot's testing, FSR 4 Quality delivered a 29% frame-rate uplift on the 9070 versus a 23% uplift from DLSS 4 Quality on the 5070 (TechSpot). Where FSR 4 is supported, the 9070 no longer trades away picture quality to gain frames.

The RTX 5070's edge is reach, not per-title quality. DLSS ships in far more games than FSR, it is likelier to be present on day one of a new release, and the RTX 50 series adds Multi Frame Generation, which the 9070 has no direct equivalent to. The catch for AMD is that FSR 4 only helps in titles that support it — older games fall back to worse FSR versions or none at all. If you buy new releases at launch and lean on upscaling to hit high refresh, that ecosystem breadth is a real, if situational, reason to choose the 5070.

VRAM and power: two quiet wins for the RX 9070

The RX 9070 carries 16GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus; the RTX 5070 has 12GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus. The 5070's memory is faster per gigabyte, but 12GB is already the tight number at 1440p when you max textures and enable ray tracing in the newest games — and RT itself consumes VRAM. The 9070's extra 4GB is the more future-proof position for a card you plan to keep a few years. If you are unsure how much you need, our guide to how much VRAM gaming actually requires walks through it by resolution and settings.

Asus AMD Radeon RX 9070 16GB GDDR6
Asus AMD Radeon RX 9070 16GB GDDR6

Power is the other quiet win. The 9070 is rated at 220W board power against the 5070's 250W, and in gaming GamersNexus measured about 224W versus 231W (GamersNexus) — so the faster raster card is also the cooler, quieter one in most titles. Both are comfortable on a quality 650W supply; our PSU wattage guide for RTX 50-series cards covers the math, and it applies to a 9070 build at this power level too.

Price and availability in our catalog

Prices move, so here is where the two sit in our catalog as of writing:

RTX 5070RX 9070
Price (our catalog)$916.60$957.72
Memory12GB GDDR716GB GDDR6
Rated board power250W220W
1440p raster (vs the other)baseline~13% faster
Heavy ray tracingPulls far aheadFalls off
UpscalingDLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen, wider supportFSR 4, RDNA 4 only

The gap is only about $41, so unlike the higher tiers this is not a "pay double for a small gain" argument — it is a straight trade of strengths. You can drop either card into a full build with automatic compatibility and power-supply checks in our PC Builder, and our best GPU for 1440p gaming roundup shows where each sits against the rest of the stack.

Who should buy which

  • Buy the RX 9070 if you game at 1440p in mostly rasterized titles, want 16GB of VRAM for headroom, or care about lower power and noise. You get more frames per dollar and the more future-proof memory for essentially the same money.
  • Buy the RTX 5070 if you play path-traced games, want the widest day-one upscaling support plus Multi Frame Generation, or run CUDA/NVENC creator workloads — the areas where the 9070 genuinely falls behind.

The honest version: at these prices the RX 9070 is the default 1440p pick for most players, and the 5070's 12GB VRAM is the one spec that could age it early. But if ray tracing is why you are upgrading, the raster average is the wrong number to shop by — the 5070's RT lead is exactly the thing a spec-sheet glance misses. If you want the step-up fight one tier higher, our RTX 5070 Ti vs RX 9070 XT breakdown covers the same trade at more frames and more money.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the RX 9070 better than the RTX 5070?

For rasterized 1440p gaming, yes — it averages about 13% higher frame rates, has 16GB of VRAM versus 12GB, and draws less power, for only about $41 more in our catalog. The RTX 5070 is better if you play heavy path-traced games or want the broadest DLSS and Multi Frame Generation support.

How much faster is the RX 9070 than the RTX 5070?

About 13% on average in 1440p rasterized games, per GamersNexus testing (for example 172 vs 152 FPS in Resident Evil 4). The lead varies by title and can flip in NVIDIA-favoring engines like Final Fantasy XIV, and it reverses entirely in heavy ray tracing, where the 5070 wins.

Is 12GB of VRAM enough for 1440p gaming?

For most games today, yes, but it is the tight number. At 1440p with maxed textures and ray tracing in the newest titles, 12GB is close to the edge, which is why the RX 9070's 16GB is the safer choice for a card you plan to keep several years.

Which card is better for ray tracing?

The RTX 5070. In light RT the two are close — Cyberpunk on medium RT was roughly tied — but in heavy path tracing the 5070 pulls far ahead, tripling the RX 9070's frame rate in Black Myth: Wukong at 4K in GamersNexus testing.

Do I need a bigger power supply for the RTX 5070 or RX 9070?

No — both are comfortable on a quality 650W supply. The RX 9070 actually draws less (220W rated versus 250W for the 5070), so if anything the NVIDIA card is the one to size a little more headroom for.

About the author

Mykhailo Druz

Written by

Mykhailo Druz

Co-Founder, Technical Lead & Editor-in-Chief, TechCortex

Mykhailo Druz is a co-founder, technical lead, and editor-in-chief at TechCortex, a US PC hardware store. As the company developer, he created CortyAI, the AI assistant behind the TechCortex PC Builder.

Core i5-14400F vs i5-14600K: What Gaming Gains
Comparisons
CPU
Intel

Core i5-14400F vs i5-14600K: What Gaming Gains

For pure gaming at 1440p the cheaper i5-14400F gives up almost nothing to the i5-14600K. The 14600K only pulls ahead in CPU-bound 1080p (14-32% in demanding titles) and in multi-core work (~55%), for about $127 more. Here's which Intel i5 fits your build.

October 25, 2026
9 min
1
Core i5-14600K vs i9-14900K: What Changes in Games
Comparisons
CPU
Intel

Core i5-14600K vs i9-14900K: What Changes in Games

For gaming the i5-14600K lands within about 10% of the i9-14900K at 1080p and effectively ties at 1440p, for roughly $295 less. The i9 only pulls ahead in heavy multi-threaded work. Here's which to buy, and when a gaming-first build should skip both.

October 23, 2026
9 min
6
Core i5-12400 vs i5-14600K: Which One Wins for Gaming
Comparisons
CPU
Intel

Core i5-12400 vs i5-14600K: Which One Wins for Gaming

The i5-14600K costs $108 more than the i5-12400 and adds 8 E-cores, but in GPU-bound 1440p gaming that premium buys almost nothing. Here is when it is worth paying and when it is not.

October 20, 2026
7 min
8
Ryzen 5 5600X vs 7600X: Is the AM5 Jump Worth It?
Comparisons
CPU
AMD

Ryzen 5 5600X vs 7600X: Is the AM5 Jump Worth It?

In our catalog the newer 7600X is both faster and cheaper than the 5600X as a bare chip. So the only reason to buy a 5600X new is to reuse an AM4 board and DDR4 you already own. Here is the math.

October 19, 2026
8 min
14
RTX 5060 Ti vs RTX 5070 Ti: Where the 1440p Jump Pays Off
Comparisons
GPU
NVIDIA

RTX 5060 Ti vs RTX 5070 Ti: Where the 1440p Jump Pays Off

Both cards carry 16GB, so the fight is pure horsepower: the RTX 5070 Ti is 55-80% faster at 1440p but costs about $480 more. Where that premium pays off, and where the 5060 Ti is the smarter buy.

October 18, 2026
7 min
12
Ryzen 5 7600X vs Core i5-14600K: What Changes in Games
Comparisons
CPU
AMD

Ryzen 5 7600X vs Core i5-14600K: What Changes in Games

The 14600K is about 8% faster in CPU-limited gaming but costs 78% more than the 7600X. Here is which one is the smarter buy, and the one workload that flips the answer.

October 14, 2026
7 min
14